Best Hong Kong VPN Providers 2022

Traffic P2P Countries # IPs Logs Clients Trial Protocols Offers
unlimited filesharing allowed 94 15000+ No Logs Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, iOS 30 Days Money Back Guarantee OpenVPN, L2TP/IPsec, SSTP, PPTP View Offers
unlimitiert filesharing allowed 190 120.000 Yes Mac, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android 30 Days Free Trial OpenVPN (Windows, Android), IKEv2/IPSec (Mac, iOS) View Offers
unlimited filesharing allowed 60+ 40000 No Logs Mac, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android 7 Days Money Back Guarantee PPTP, L2TP, Open VPN View Offers
unlimited filesharing allowed 9 unspecified No Logs Windows, Mac, Linux, iOS, Android 7 Days Money Back Guarantee OpenVPN, PPTP, L2TP/IPSec View Offers
unlimited filesharing allowed 32 unspecified No Logs Windows, Mac, Linux, iOS, Android No L2TP/IP, PPTP, SSTP, OpenVPN View Offers
unlimited (Premium) partially 12 unspecified No Logs Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, iOS Free Version IKEv2, IKEv1, OpenVPN, PPTP, L2TP/IPsec View Offers
unlimitiert partially 141 80000 No Windows, Mac, Linux, iOS, Android 7 Days Money Back Guarantee PPTP, OpenVPN, IKEv2, L2TP/IPSec, SSTP View Offers
1TB/month partially 10 unspecified No Logs Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, iOS 7 Days Money Back Guarantee OpenVPN, L2TP/IPsec, PPTP View Offers

Watch TV and live streams from Hong Kong with an IP adress from Hong Kong

Best Hong Kong VPN Providers

Hong Kong is a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration on the Question of Hong Kong as well as the SAR’s charter, the Basic Law of the SAR, specify that Hong Kong will have a high level of autonomy except in matters of defense and foreign affairs. Chapter III of the Basic Law summarizes “Fundamental Rights and obligations of the Residents” including freedom of expression and organization and solitude rights. The Hong Kong Bill of Rights elaborates on these as well as other rights enjoyed by individuals of Hong Kong.

Computer crime ordinances

“Section 161: Access to computer with criminal or dishonest motive” of the Crimes Ordinance (Cap 200) which was enacted in 1993 before the prevalent use the Internet as well as the increase of e commerce typically, supplies it is an offense to get access to your computer:

With the intention to perpetrate an offense;
With a dishonest intent
with a view to obtain for oneself or another;
Or having a dishonest intent to cause loss.

Conviction upon indictment of these violations carries a maximum punishment of five years.

Section 27A of the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap 106) enacted in 2000 provides that “any individual who, by telecommunications, intentionally causes a computer to execute any function to get unauthorized access to any application or data held in a computer commits an offense and is liable on conviction to a fine of HK$20000”.


Pursuant to the Control of Obscene and Indecent Articles Ordinance (Cap 390), it’s an offense to publish a post that is obscene. Publication covers distribution, circulation, selling, offering, hiring, or loaning the post that is obscene. Distribution by email falls within the meaning as does the setting of an obscene post on an internet site. Distribution will not require any component. The definition contains “anything consisting of or containing content to be read or looked at or both read and looked at, any sound recording, and any movie, video tape, phonograph record, or alternative record of a picture or pictures”. An article is likely to be considered obscene if, by reason by its own obscenity, “it’s not acceptable to be printed to any man”. Obscenity comprises “violence, depravity, and repulsiveness”. The punishment for this particular violation is a fine of up along with up to three years imprisonment.

It’s an offense to own, create, reproduce, import, or export porn affecting a kid under 18 years old , or to print or cause to be published any ad that carries or will probably be understood as sharing the message that any man has printed, publishes, or intends to print any child pornography. The punishment for ad, publication, or development is eight years’ incarceration, while possession carries a punishment of five years’ imprisonment.


The Copyright Ordinance (Chapter 528) supplies the legal framework for copyright protection in Hong Kong. In April 2011 the authorities introduced the Copyright (changes) Bill 2011 that, if passed, will introduce (i) a new technology-neutral exclusive right for copyright owners to convey their works through any mode of electronic transmission, with criminal sanctions against people who make unauthorised communication of copyright works to the people; (ii) safe harbor provisions for internet service suppliers; and (iii) added considerations from the courts when awarding added damages for copyright infringement.

You can find criticisms that freedom of speech is threatened by the proposed changes forbidding unauthorized usage of copyright content in just about any medium. The bill may negatively change works of satire or parody online since there’s no “fair use exclusion”. The position of the government is that intellectual property rights reinforce. Some pan-democratic activists and supporters termed the bill an “Internet Post 23” (a reference to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23, contentious anti-subversion measures the government suggested in 2002 that led to Hong Kong’s biggest-ever road protests, the projected post was removed in September 2003).

Self censorship

You can find reports of media self censorship since companies own most media outlets with interests causing editors and writers to defer to the perceived concerns of publishers affecting their company interests. Some scholars propose that Hong Kong-based professors practice some self censorship within their China-related work to maintain good relationships and lecturing and research chances.

In a survey released in June 2012 by the Hong Kong Journalists Association, 86.9% of the 663 journalists surveyed believed that press freedom had deteriorated in the previous seven years. It is a 28.5% increase from a similar survey in 2007. People who felt liberty had decreased credited the change to: tighter government control (92%), self censorship on the market (71%), hindrance from Beijing (67.5%), and pressure from the business sector (35.9%). Based on respondents the policies that most influence the decrease in independence are: Area news info being commanded by law enforcement as well as the Fire Services Department (57%); releasing more official footage and posts and fewer news events being reachable to reporters (41.3); off the record briefings growing enormously (23.8); and a government proposition to criminalize stalking (16%).

Local ISP shutdown – March 1995

In March 1995, Royal Hong Kong Police raided all but among the initiating local Internet Service Providers (ISP) offering dialup service, confiscated their servers and records and close them down for a week, blocking the accessibility of 5000 to 8000 of Hong Kong’s early Internet adopters.[12] The raids were presumed to be instigated by Supernet, the one ISP not shutdown, and organized from the Office of Telecommunications Authority (OFTA) working using the Commercial Crime Bureau (CCB) to the assumption the ISPs were running without applying to get a then-remote Public Non-Exclusive Telecommunications Service (PNETS) permit. businesses shut down were: Hong Kong Internet & Gateway Services (HKIGS), Hong Kong Link InfoLink Ilink, Internet On-Line Hong Kong, Cybernet, Internet Connections, and Asia Online.

Edison Chen photograph scandal – January 2008

In January and February 2008, the Hong Kong Police Force detained ten individuals who have been accused of getting, uploading, or broadcasting pornographic pictures after Emperor Entertainment Group (EEG), a multi-billion amusement business, filed a charge in regards to the access to the photographs online. The indecent and obscene[citation needed] pictures in question were of the Hong Kong celebrity Edison Chen with various girls, several of whom were local celebrities. Chen said the private pictures was stolen and printed without his permission, and acknowledged being the writer and copyright owner of a lot of the pictures. A computer technician was convicted of three counts of getting access to a pc with dishonest purpose, and received a custodial sentence of eight and a half months.

The Hong Kong entertainment industry shook and received high profile media interest all over the world and locally. Law enforcement met with more than 200 individuals responsible for leading Hong Kong sites and BBS communities to encourage them to delete the photos “as they’ve the duty to prevent offenses”. Associated conversation threads were increasingly deleted. Law enforcement ordered several locally documented web sites and BBS direction companies to submit information regarding their clients, and had remembered the IP addresses of more than 30 Internet users who supposedly posted photos. The police crack down raised questions over breaches of the secrecy and free speech rights of Internet users as well as the particular application of the law.

Imprint | Best VPN Providers 2022